You Can Be Skeptical of MagicJack – But Not How They Got Retail Leverage

THIS IS AN EXCERPT; TO READ FULL ARTICLE, CLICK ON TITLE.

SUMMARY:

MAGICJACK: RETAIL AND DIRECT IN PERFECT HARMONY:

So you might ask yourself wasn’t MagicJack giving up something by tagging retailers, effectively pointing potential customers to stores?

Well they can start dialing back their Direct Response spend, or at least keep it flat. Plus after 2-3 years of hitting the airwaves hard with the same product, there are diminishing margins of return on the number of people who will buy your product direct. Chances are they saw the ad – if they were going to buy it direct they would have done so already.

Retail represents an untapped market. There are people who won’t buy direct, or maybe never even saw it on TV. And there is a good chance the retail margin they’ll pay is probably close to the cost per order to sell direct (media costs + fulfillment.

LESSONS LEARNED:

1A) Infomercials are a great vehicle for telling a story and building demand at retail.

1B) Marketers with a holier than thou attitude towards Direct Response TV (DRTV) are ignoring a viable tactic.

2) Take risk away from the retail buyer. This makes it easier for them to list / support your product. MagicJack wouldn’t be at retail if they didn’t have a success story from their direct experience, as well as ongoing aircover in the form of their DRTV spots they continue to run that in effect are ads for their retail placements.

3) There is less risk in balancing a direct and retail strategy than ever before. The battle lines have been blurred by retail consolidation, and the growth of private label. I don’t think the retail buyer spends much time worrying about where you are selling your product, as long as it is selling well in their stores. We spend way too much time worrying about who we compete against, versus just selling.